Dear Friends,
I am having a difficult time deciding on what to share today. I don’t want to overwhelm you with too much information, so I’m choosing two topics—
Ordinance 2022-29 Acknowledging Approval of Proposed Policies for Consistency with Vision 2050 (scheduled for a final vote May 17) and Safe Parking Lots,
2022-24, (recently vetoed).
I’ll start with the shorter story, which is about “Safe Parking Lots” that passed 4-3 in the April 19 council meeting. When I first heard of the concept, I couldn’t imagine any parking lot being safe in today’s world, but with a quick search, I discovered it wasn’t by any means a new concept.
Here is a 2018 study,
Hidden in Plain Sight: Finding Safe Parking for Vehicle Residents, that refers to a program in 2004. It recommends starting small and building a strong reputation before trying to expand in size or scope. I can agree with that, hence, my no vote on the ordinance. The state authorized this concept for religious venues. The ordinance went beyond that limitation.
Recently, I engaged in a conversation with a religious organization that is assisting maybe up to six families/people at the most, at any one time, to address unique situations. By that, I mean someone, or a family, moved across the country for a job, only to find out it was a scam, or perhaps a family was enroute to relocate and lodging arrangements were derailed, or maybe someone was fleeing from a dangerous situation.
These are folks who find themselves in a “season” of challenges, not in a “lifestyle” of dependent living. This approach offers support and guidance from folks whose hearts are hardwired to serve in this arena of human need. I’m pleased to share that stories of success were reported after a few weeks of assistance. Safe Parking is not an ultimate solution, but it can be a godsend for someone in need. There will be more legislation coming on that topic. In the meantime, please share your concerns, both pro and con.