Several years ago, the County pursued a new administrative building. What is the difference with this approach?

The General Services Building proposal focused on combining all administrative functions, including those housed at the Annex, into one location. The financing for that project would have required either additional taxes or the reduction of services to pay for the debt service. More importantly, it did not address any justice-related activities. 

The purchase of this building allows the County to free up space in the CCB for justice-related functions, without spending $80 million to $120 million on building a new facility. The building purchase would accelerate the remodels of three floors to further Justice Center services. Upon completion, the County would be able to consolidate some administrative services, while ending $1.9 million in annual lease payments in downtown Tacoma. All future operational expenses and bond debt can be covered by the retirement of leases and the retirement of two past bond issuances.

Show All Answers

1. What building did Pierce County purchase?
2. Why did Pierce County purchase the building?
3. How much did the County pay to purchase the building?
4. How is the County funding this purchase?
5. What benefit is this sale to Pierce County and taxpayers?
6. Which Pierce County departments will be moving to the new building?
7. Will this purchase impact any County leased spaces or employees located in other County owned/leased buildings?
8. Several years ago, the County pursued a new administrative building. What is the difference with this approach?
9. Why is this a good idea?